Beranda commented on:
Angela commented on: Group 1 and Group 3
Angela completed the introduction and Case Study #1.
Beranda completed Case Study #2 and the Discussion section.
Angela commented on: Group 1 and Group 3
Angela completed the introduction and Case Study #1.
Beranda completed Case Study #2 and the Discussion section.
Community Partnership
Beranda Cantrell
Angela Vanderluit
EDAC 648
Introduction
This
paper will examine two different examples of community partnerships. These partnerships focus on different areas,
but have goals related to domestic violence prevention and youth intervention. The two organizations our group has chosen
are the Dawn Project in Marion County, Indiana and On Track Recovery in two
Oregon Counties. The Dawn Project is
close to home and On Track is across the country, but both provide good
examples of what good can come of community-based partnerships. The Dawn Project is a partnership created by
government officials to treat young people with severe behavioral issues. This project aims to treat the emotional side
of these issues and work with families who are entwined in the system. The clients of the Dawn Project are at a
serious risk of being removed from their homes, so it is important that they
take a more holistic approach to treatment than punishment (Children's Bureau,
2010). On Track Recovery of Oregon
utilizes community partnerships to provide treatment for mental health issues,
substance abuse, and domestic violence prevention as well as other programs. On Track is able to provide these services to
anyone and everyone regardless of ability to pay because of the community
partnerships established. It is hoped
that this exploration of two geographically distant community partnerships will
show the benefit and usefulness of such endeavors.
Case Study: On Track
Recovery
On Track Recovery is located in
Oregon. This community partnership
provides treatment for a variety of mental health issues and programs for the
prevention of substance abuse and domestic violence. Because of the partnerships that this
community organization has made, they are able to provide services in a way
that does not discriminate at all, even based on the inability to pay for
treatment. For On Track Recovery,
partnerships mean all the difference when it comes to being able to provide
services to those in need. Because of
these partnerships, the organization can treat people even if they would be
unable to pay for services. Their
website stresses the importance of getting help regardless of financial
situation. This is so important because
the cost can keep people who want and need to enter a treatment course from
pursuing it (Programs, On Track Inc).
The services On Track Recovery is
able to provide are important for the health of the whole person and the
community. They offer a wide variety of
programs including mental health treatment, substance abuse, and domestic
violence prevention. Because our project
as a whole has focused on domestic violence prevention, treatment, and women’s
shelters, this community partnership seemed like a good example. It is important to remember that domestic
violence occurs in the context of families and communities. This problem can be indicative of other
mental health or substance abuse problems.
The family that has gone through domestic violence is in need of the
other services that On Track provides because of the trauma that is involved in
domestic violence. On Track sees
domestic violence and substance abuse as part of a system of problems, and so
offers a variety of resources and services.
On Track Recovery operates to serve
the areas of Jackson and Josephine Counties in Oregon. On Track receives funding from many different
partners in the community. These include
the United Way, a local Native American foundation, and the Oregon Shakespeare
Festival in addition to city and county organizations. Funding also comes from the following city
and county organizational partners: the
Community Justice Department, Health and Human Services, Commission on Children
and Families, Oregon Community Foundation, and the city governments of Medford
and Ashland. On Track also receives
funds from state and local sources in addition to private insurance and client
fees (Agency Funding, On Track Inc.)
Case Study: The Dawn Project
The
Dawn Project is located in Marion County, Indiana. Their mission is to provide “new
and improved levels of help and assistance to children with serious emotional
disturbances and their families” ("B. the dawn," 2003). The mission
is founded upon the belief that these troubled children, and their families,
can go from negative to positive development with the proper community support
system. The three main goals of the program are: (1) Incorporation of parent
involvement in the design, implementation, and evaluation of Dawn and its
services. This is done on every level of care – from the child and family to the
city, county, and State governance; (2) To provide a single comprehensive
system of care to children with behavioral issues and their families, no matter
if the primary system of involvement is Child Welfare, Mental Health, Juvenile
Justice, Correction, or Special Education; and (3) Development of a system of
care in which all the child serving entities achieve positive outcome through
early intervention. This comes with increased understanding of, and adherence
to, a strengths-based and values-based approach to care ("B. the
dawn," 2003). The Dawn project also has four specific objectives to help achieve
these goals: (1) expanding services to three new populations; (2) expanding the
family organization; (3) participating in an external evaluation process to
validate system activities; and (4) develop a social marketing plan on
system-of-care principles ("B. the dawn," 2003). Children are
referred to the Dawn Project from the child welfare, juvenile probation, or special
education systems. The children are accepted into the program based on established
eligibility criteria. The eligibility criteria includes: functional impairment
in two life domains, involved in two or more systems (child welfare, juvenile
justice, mental health, or special education), at-risk of, or already in,
residential treatment, resident of Marion county, between five and 17 years of
age, and a duration of impairment lasting at least six months (Hepburn &
McCarthy, 2003).
Without the community partnerships of
important organizations, this project would not exist. The first initiative of
the project was to establish a family support group, which is now a family
support organization titled Families Reaching for Rainbows. Many other community
organizations have teamed up to be a part of this project to provide support to
children who have serious emotional or behavioral disorders. These
organizations include (Hepburn & McCarthy, 2003):
·
Indiana
Behavioral Health Choices (Choices) – the lead agency
·
State
mental health agency
·
Special
education agency
·
County
child welfare agency
·
Juvenile
court
·
Local
government
The Dawn project also utilizes an interagency governance
called the Dawn Project consortium. It is made up of payor agencies, families,
referring agencies, the managed care entity, advocates, and additional
representatives from public schools. The Consortium meets monthly and works
across agencies to integrate school plans, court orders, probation
requirements, and mental health plans into one coordinated plan that is
manageable for the families (Hepburn & McCarthy, 2003).
The methods used by the Dawn Project
to establish partnerships would include finding which organizations could
promote positive support to children with behavioral issues, organizations that
are willing to partner with the Dawn Project to establish early intervention
for such children, and organizations that can provide funding for what the
program is trying to accomplish. By partnering with organizations such as Child
Welfare and the juvenile court systems, the Dawn project is able to intervene early
and promote positive support to children with behavioral issues. While
social-networking is not used within the Dawn Project, it does leave them room
to grow and expand in the future. The only current way that children are being
reached out to is through the community organizations in which the Dawn Project
partners with (i.e. court or welfare system suggesting it to families).
Discussion
This section will discuss both
organizations and their community partnerships.
The discussion seeks to summarize the main idea behind these
partnerships and how they are important to the organization. The point of the discussion is to find out
what type of partnerships can be used for different organizations, and how they
use them effectively.
The first case study was over On
Track Recovery, a community partnership that provides treatment for a variety
of mental health issues and programs for the prevention of substance abuse and
domestic violence. One of the main benefits of this community partnership is
that no one is turned away for not being able to pay. On Track Recovery
receives funding from over 15 different organizations including: the United
Way, local and state agencies, and private insurance. On Track Recovery also
partners with local governments, such as the court systems, in order to help
people who abuse substances overcome their addictions. Suggestions, from this
case study, for community educators who are looking to start a community
partnership, would be to try to connect with as many local organizations as
possible to get adequate funding. Grants are another way to ensure that you
will reach all people in your community, instead of only those with financial
resources.
The second case study, the Dawn
Project, focuses on helping children aged five to 17 have the support system
they need to overcome their emotional or behavioral issues. It includes
multiple partnerships such as the Marion County Mental Health Association, school
systems, City County Council, Department of Corrections, the Mayor’s Office,
service providers, Families Reaching for Rainbows, and the County Auditor. It
is important that all of these organizations come together for this partnership
to work. This specific organization uses an interagency Consortium that governs
different aspects of the program. The Dawn Project takes new clients as
recommended by the court or welfare system, provides the support system through
school systems and Families Reaching for Rainbows, and organizes all of its
funds through the county auditor. Suggestions for community educators wishing
to start a community partnership, based off of this case study, would include
making sure that you have all of the local organizations you need to be
successful. The Dawn Project also utilizes managed care technologies that
include information management with “real time” data. This program does not,
however, include any type of social media/social networking qualities and that
would be something community educators would want to include to spread the word
of their organization.
On Track Recovery
|
Dawn Project
|
|
Main stakeholders and purpose
|
Funding institutions
– make it possible for treatment to occur
Family and Community Services – promotion of program
|
Choices – manages care of children in program
State agencies – refer children to program, make manageable
care plans for families
Family partnership – support group for children and their
families
|
Strategies/tools/methods used for identifying and
establishing partnerships and collaborating with partners
|
Need for monetary donations; establishing partnerships to
fulfill this need
|
Early intervention,
manageable care plans, measurable goals
|
Strategies/tools used for engaging participants
|
Offering different types of services: Day Treatment, family
programs, youth programs, etc.
|
Most children are troubled so possibility of lessened punishment
with completion of program; also the importance of family and positive
reinforcement
|
Main ideas you have learned
|
Partnership with
funding can help program succeed by providing financial resources to those
who could otherwise not afford it.
|
Interagency Consortium is beneficial;
Community partnership, as well as family, is essential;
common goals/common ground
|
Suggestions for practitioners
|
Obtain funding through organizations such as the United Way
(if possible); Obtain grants (if possible)
|
Local partnership is important; information management
system; utilize social media/social networking in some way
|
References
B. the dawn project - marion county, indianapolis, in. (2003). Retrieved from
http://www.choicesteam.org/documents/choices/excerptfrompromisingapproaches1.pdf
Children's Bureau. (2010). Community partnerships:
Improving the response to child maltreatment. Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/partners/appende.cfm
Children's Mental Health Network. (n.d.). Dawn project.
Retrieved from http://www.cmhnetwork.org/alumni/map/indiana/dawn-project
Hepburn, K., & McCarthy, J. (2003). Making interagency
initiatives work for children and families in the child welfare system. Promising
Approaches for Behavioral Health Services to Children and Adolescents and Their
Families in Managed Care Systems, Retrieved from
http://www.chcs.org/usr_doc/promising_approaches3.pdf
I think that it is great that you have connected projects across a common theme! I also admire that you chose an agency that is further away from Indiana, and that you didn’t limit the scope of your review to just a local organization. I have experience working with members from the Dawn Project. They assisted in funding wrap-around services for a child that I was assigned as an advocate. This child was in Residential placement and needed supports in the home environment so that he could be released and be successful. Dawn funded a major portion of that and even helped find staff to support this student. They provided a type of case-management that was very helpful at the time. The juvenile courts were very receptive to their support and they had received a welcoming level of support from the courts, parents, and the Residential school.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting paper. I like the fact that you have connected two partnerships which occur as a result of similar issues. I found the On Track partnership in Oregon to be very intriguing and found myself wondering whether such a program would also help deal with some of the issues related to homelessness (since many of the homeless struggle with mental health issues). I also found myself very interested in the Dawn project which is more local. I have not read about the program before, but I would agree that it is a needed addition to the resources available in Marion County.
ReplyDeleteBoth cases are interesting! I like your Discussion and Introduction!
ReplyDeleteIn case one, you introduced the programs offered by the On Track Recovery and the list of the partners they collaborated with. Please address the following questions:
• What methods did the community educators/leaders use to identify different levels of community partners and collaborations in community?
• How did community educators/leaders establish partnerships with for-profit and nonprofit organizations, and public organizations/private organizations, and how did community educators/leaders collaborate with these partners?
In your Discuss and/or Introduction, cite some ideas from the literature to support your arguments.
Bo